Styling remained essentially unchanged for 1967, but the GTO saw several significant mechanical changes.A corporate policy decision banned multiple carburetors for all cars except the Chevrolet Corvette, so the Tri-Power engine was cancelled and replaced with new quadrajet four-barrel carburetor. Chevrolet was able to keep the tri-power set up to help with their image; the GTO was really becoming a serious competition problem for them. To compensate, the 389 engine received a slightly wider cylinder bore (4.12 inches, 104.7 mm) for a total displacement of 400 in³ (6.6 L). Torque increased slightly, from 431 to 441 ft-lbf (584 to 598 N·m) for the base engine, from 424 to 438 ft-lbf (575 to 594 N·m) for the optional engine but power remained the same. Testers found little performance difference, although the distinctive sound and fury of the Tri-Power was missed.Two new engines were offered. The first was an economy engine, also 400 in³ but with a two-barrel carburetor, 8.6:1 compression, and a rating of 265 hp (198 kW) and 397 ft-lbf (538 N·m) of torque. Offered only with an automatic, it was not well received by GTO buyers. As well as other engines the biggest one was the 400ci. There we two models in this 6.5 liter engine the regular one which had 335hp and the HO(high output) which had 360hp. The HO replaced the tripower that the GTO had the year before (268 kW) GTO. It was available only with 3.90:1 or 4.33:1 differential gearing, and its "hotter" camshaft left it with a notably lumpier idle and less cooperative part-throttle response.Emission controls, including an air injector system, were fitted in GTOs sold in California only.The two-speed automatic was replaced with the three-speed Turbo-Hydramatic TH400, which was available with any engine. When the Strato bucket seats and console were ordered, the TH was further enhanced by the use of Hurst's Dual-Gate shifter, which permitted automatic shifting in "Drive' or manual selection through the gears. It was generally considered an equal match for the four-speed in most performance aspects. Meanwhile, the Tempest's inadequate drum brakes could be replaced by optional disc brakes on the front wheels (for US$104.79, including power boost), a vast improvement in both braking performance and fade resistance.Hot Rod Magazine tested a 1967 Ram Air GTO with Turbo-Hydramatic and 3.90 gearing, and obtained a quarter-mile performance of 14.51 seconds @ 98.79 miles per hour (158.99 km/h) in pure-stock form, rising to 14.11 @ 101.23 miles per hour (162.91 km/h) with accessory drive belts removed, new spark plugs, and a slight modification to the carburetor. Car Life's similar car ran 0-60 mph (0-97 km/h) in 6.1 seconds and the quarter in 14.5 seconds @ 102 mph (163 km/h) with 4.33 rear differential. They were critical, however, of the Ram Air's behavior and tendency to overheat in traffic, as well as the ease with which a careless driver could exceed the 5,600 rpm redline in top gear (which limited the car to a maximum speed of 107 mph (171 km/h) with a 4.33 axle ratio). Nor was it cheap: for performance and appointments very similar to their 1965 Tri-Power, the price was US$4,422, a 20% increase.Nevertheless, GTO sales remained high at 81,722. [ - ]

Styling remained essentially unchanged for 1967, but the GTO saw several significant mechanical... [ + ]