Freebase: Discussion about micahsaul

Musical Release: Barcode & Catalog Number

2009-12-23T19:31:10.0013Z

I think it’s a question of how much we want to duplicate MusicBrainz. I think there is real value in bringing their artist/release/track data into our more clearly interlinked world, but I am not sure that same value applies to catalog information. A client widget to dynamically pull that information into the display would be pretty cool. I could be convinced either way, though.

Musical Release: Barcode & Catalog Number

2009-12-23T18:18:06.0018Z

It would be very convenient to include into the Musical Release type the following items : - the Catalog Numer - the Barcode

What do you think about that ?

Regards

Phil.B

Christopher Jones: Delete - Wikipedia disambiguation page

2009-12-22T22:15:16.0013Z

Movie data has been moved to the actor. The remainder can be deleted.

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-21T22:38:15.0012Z

The changes under consideration are discussed on our wiki, here. I'm not sure how much of what you're considering would affect or be affected by them (although certainly just creating a schema for thematic catalogs shouldn't affect anything).

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-21T22:14:34.0023Z

A further thought: if big changes to the music structures are planned for the next few months should I hold off doing this?

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-21T22:13:27.0002Z

I think anyone who creates a thematic catalog is almost certainly, in fact, a musicologist but most musicologists do not create catalogs, so I'll change 'musicologist' in the schema to 'thematic catalog creator'.

'Thematic Catalog creator' could then be usefully picked up by anyone who wants to build a base of musicologists.

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-21T20:09:58.0006Z

I second Phil's comment about musicologist. Most musicologists haven't created a thematic catalog, so it would seem a bit odd to have a type for musicologists with only one property which didn't related to the majority of them. (There are lots of commons types with properties that only apply to some of the instances, but those properties aren't typically the only property of the type.) In general, though, I think this would be a useful schema to have in the commons.

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-20T22:40:29.0000Z

One more thought: is someone who creates a thematic catalog automatically a musicologist? (I have no opinion on this due to a complete lack of knowing what I'm talking about). If not, references to "musicologist" should probably become "thematic catalog creator".

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-19T10:14:13.0018Z

If you haven't already, it's definitely worth reading the Commons page on the wiki. Generally, this looks good to me, but a few mostly nitpick comments:

Documentation: none of the properties of thematic catalog are documented. Musicologist isn't documented at all.
Documentation part 2: the type description for thematic catalog doesn't really tell me anything that the name of the type doesn't. What is this type for? What sort of things should be typed as this type?
Musicologist should probably include /people/person.
Are we sure there are no thematic catalogs which refer to more than one composer?
Consider if any of the properties should be disambiguators.
I don't really see the value in having the underscore in the musicologist_s key.

Hope this helps!

Music: Thematic catalogs

2009-12-19T05:57:26.0037Z

I've built a base of thematic catalogs (for classical composers) http://www.freebase.com/type/schema/user/simonhill/default_domain/thematic_catalog

Does this belong in music commons and/or should there a reciprical link to it for composers?

I'd like to get reference to the database showing up under each composers - without having to have separate (duplicative) composer topics in my db.

I'd be grateful for any help or ideas.

Simon

Composition: adopus number and catalog numbers

2009-12-19T05:38:49.0028Z

How about adding opus number and catalog number(s).

I am building a base of thematic catalog numbers http://www.freebase.com/type/schema/user/simonhill/default_domain/thematic_catalog which can be used to validate against!

I could then write a Songbird add-on to pick up and show work names, dates etc. for the music I am playing!

Adaptation: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T23:09:07.0000Z

I thought about using the Adaptation type too...it would require an uncommon if not unusual interpretation of the word "adaptation". The Lego Star Wars games do follow the films' plot line closely, so I suppose it would make sense. Definitely will cotype with Work of Fiction.

Star Wars: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T23:09:07.0000Z

Adaptation: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T08:15:39.0013Z

I'd use adaptation: this game is an adaptation of Episodes I-III while this one is an adaptation of Episodes IV - VI, and they're both works of fiction set in the Star Wars Universe (without personally caring "which" Star Wars universe that is, but I appreciate other people might).

I'm not sure that the LEGO theme and the video game series should be the same topic.

Star Wars: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T08:15:39.0013Z

I'm not sure that the LEGO theme and the video game series should be the same topic.

Adaptation: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T00:45:51.0005Z

Hi,

How should I use to link a video game that either exists within the realm of or extends that of an existing work, such as a film? For example, I would like to say that the Lego Star Wars game series is derived from the Star Wars films, and is a part of the Star Wars franchise. There are several Franchise types but none pertains to video games. There's also Consumer Product with property Product Line that can probably be used to link books and films and games and toys of the same theme together.

Another possibility is to use Fictional Universe to indicate that a game is defined within a fictional universe. However, some fandoms are quite sensitive about Canon vs. Expanded Universe. Video games can be problematic when it comes to continuity.

Suggestions?

Star Wars: Games "based on" existing works (e.g. films)

2009-12-15T00:45:51.0005Z

Hi,

Suggestions?

Country: Incorrect ID

2009-12-14T15:11:19.0013Z

Thanks for the clear explanation!

I understand that each URI is really just a GUID of sorts, and the data works fine when requested by that name. It just looked erroneous to be using that one as the primary ID when I queried for http://rdf.freebase.com/rdf/music.genre . It was an odd one out. I was a bit concerned that something with a UserID in the path may be sandbox data rather than canonic. Is there a way to promote http://www.freebase.com/view/en/country_music to being the 'preferred' or primary ID? ... Or not ... I see that is actually meaning a specific album name :-( . Dang.

FYI, the issue is: I'm testing a facility to import and reference shared vocabularies, and was planning to use the supplied URI/GUIDs as a primary key in an internal RDF triplestore. (Maybe I shouldn't do that, and just internalize the sameAs relations)

The given URI will still work (thanks for clearing that up) but just looked out of place in the diagnostic logs I was seeing. Partially (my fault) because my code is using the key found at the end of an URL as a temporary name for placeholder topics that haven't been individually fully retrieved yet. This is an ugly short-cut, but was returning sane results most of the time. My data queue listed : [ ... pop_music, trance_music, 00b3-10cd, breakbeat, black_metal ... ] ... I'll eventually be able to resolve that as I get the preferred name I guess. Just something to know! Thanks again. I think I'll be able to work with this..

Country: Incorrect ID

2009-12-14T14:08:44.0013Z

This is entirely expected. Each entity in Freebase can be referred to either by its GUID, or by an arbitrary number (possibly zero) of other IDs; there's then an algorithm which chooses the "primary" ID for each topic. Put simply, this algorithm chooses the shortest ID from the ones available, or uses the GUID if none exist.

In this case, the topic had not been assigned another ID (note that both /en/country and /en/country_music are used elsewhere), so when it was given an ID in Arthur's personal namespace, it started using that as its primary ID. However, nothing has changed here: you can still refer to this topic by its GUID or even by a number of Wikipedia keys, or even by its Wikipedia numeric article ID if you want. (The /wikipedia keys are never allowed to become the primary ID for a topic, which is why you weren't seeing those before). In the same way, you'll see raw GUIDs for any topics which don't have any other ID set.

Is this change of primary ID causing you a problem?

Country: Incorrect ID

2009-12-14T13:07:16.0014Z

Something has happened to this topic (Country Music). When the ID /user/avh/ellerdale.00b3-10cd was added to it, it seems to have taken over the identity of this resource. Now listings that include the concept of 'Country Music" Now instead include the concept of this odd User-defined Id

eg http://rdf.freebase.com/rdf/music.genre http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/type.type.instance [ http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.pop_music. http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.trance_music. http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/user.avh.ellerdale.00b3-10cd. http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.breakbeat. http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/en.black_metal ]

I can see when the erroneous ID was added http://www.freebase.com/history/view/user/avh/ellerdale/00b3-10cd But I can't see how to undo it.

I'm spotting a few other oddities (raw GUDs) in instances under music.genre as well.

Apple: Merge with Apple

2009-12-13T04:53:22.0018Z

Couldn't this be merged with the real Apple? That is what the symbol is. No need for a separate topic