Freebase is currently in read-only mode
Created by
miholc
on
6/14/2010
Although Bartholin himself was unable to explain double refraction, it was recognized as a serious contradiction to Newton's optical theories, and proved to be of great theoretical interest to both Christiaan Huyghens (who in 1678, by studying the same variety of crystal, discovered the laws of double refraction) and Newton. en
Links
| Subject | Predicate | Object/Value | Creator | Attribution | Timestamp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | /m/0c0yb6j | /base/kwebbase/kwsentence/contains_connections | /base/kwebbase/kwconnection/rasmus_bartholin_contradicted_theory_of_isaac_newton | /user/miholc | none | |
| 2 | /m/0c0yb6j | /base/kwebbase/kwsentence/contains_connections | /base/kwebbase/kwconnection/rasmus_bartholin_influenced_christiaan_huyghens | /user/miholc | none | |
| 3 | /m/0c0yb6n Bartholin continued his studies of crystallography during the 1670s, frequently collaborating with Stensen ('Steno'), who was then royal anatomist at Copenhagen. | /base/kwebbase/kwsentence/previous_sentence | /m/0c0yb6j | /user/miholc | none | |
| 4 | /m/0c0yb6j | /type/object/type | /base/kwebbase/kwsentence | /user/miholc | none | |
| 5 | /m/0c0yb6j | /type/object/permission | /boot/all_permission | /user/miholc | none | |
| 6 | /m/0c0yb6j | /type/object/name | Although Bartholin himself was unable to explain double refraction, it was recognized as a serious contradiction to Newton's optical theories, and proved to be of great theoretical interest to both Christiaan Huyghens (who in 1678, by studying the same variety of crystal, discovered the laws of double refraction) and Newton. /lang/en | /user/miholc | none | |
| next | ||||||
