although there is nothing wrong (much) with wikipedia, i think that it's time consider adding articles from the not so new Citizendium which is "an open wiki project aimed at creating an enormous, free, and reliable encyclopedia. The project, started by a founder of Wikipedia, aims to improve on the Wikipedia model by adding "gentle expert oversight" and requiring contributors to use their real names."although they have far less data then w...
more
although there is nothing wrong (much) with wikipedia, i think that it's time consider adding articles from the not so new Citizendium which is
"an open wiki project aimed at creating an enormous, free, and reliable encyclopedia. The project, started by a founder of Wikipedia, aims to improve on the Wikipedia model by adding "gentle expert oversight" and requiring contributors to use their real names."
although they have far less data then wikipedia, i think that what they have is considred a bit more reliable.
problem are - they have far less articles and those articles might be (not sure) out of date if they are dealing with news heavy subjects.
since they are still in Beta, they might suffer from strctual changes or other things that can cause freebase some problem.
since the whole wikipedia isn't shown anyway, i think it is safe enough to replace wikipedia articles with the onces they already approved in Citizendium.
if not, how about just adding a feature of double sourcing - and have both sources shown and/or linked.
