Law (skud)

Topic Filter Topic topics

Share This
table started by superalecf for the Law Base
There is no user-contributed description yet.
+

x

   
x name x image x article
+

Do you know something that's missing from this view? Add it!

If you have a list you can use our wizard to match it with topics that may already be in Freebase.
Go to the import tool »
x Treaty 7  
Treaty 7 was an agreement between Queen Victoria and several mainly Blackfoot First Nations tribes in what is today the southern portion of Alberta. It was concluded on September 22, 1877. The agreement was signed at the Blackfoot Crossing of the...
x Treaty 8 David Laird explaining Treaty 8 Fort Vermilion 1899 - NA-949-34
Treaty 8 was an agreement signed on June 21, 1899, between Queen Victoria and various First Nations of the Lesser Slave Lake area. The Treaty was signed just south of present-day Grouard, Alberta. The land covered by Treaty 8, 840,000 square...
x Blackfoot Blackfoot - Bear Bull
The Blackfoot Confederacy or Niitsítapi (meaning "original people"; c.f. Ojibwe: Anishinaabeg and Quinnipiac: Eansketambawg) is the collective name of three First Nations in Alberta and one Native American tribe in Montana. The Blackfoot Confederacy...
x Roe v. Wade Seal of the Supreme Court
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion, is one of the most controversial and politically significant cases in U.S. Supreme Court history. The Court held that a woman may...
x Loving v. Virginia Seal of the Supreme Court
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court, by a 9-0 vote, declared Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute, the "Racial Integrity Act of 1924", unconstitutional, thereby...
x Supreme Court of the United States Seal of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest judicial body in the United States, and leads the federal judiciary. It consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight Associate Justices, who are nominated by the President and...
x Abortion Angkordemon
An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo, resulting in or caused by its death. An abortion can occur spontaneously due to complications during pregnancy or can be induced, in...
x Marriage Brauysegen im Bett
Marriage is a social union or legal contract between individuals that creates kinship. It is an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged by a variety of ways, depending on the culture or...
x Race /guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000490d03c
The term race or racial group usually refers to the categorization of humans into populations or groups on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics. The physical features commonly seen as indicating race are salient visual traits such...
x Norma McCorvey Norma McCorvey, aka "Jane Roe"
Norma Leah McCorvey (née Nelson, born September 22, 1947, in Simmesport, Louisiana), better known by the legal pseudonym "Jane Roe", was the plaintiff in the landmark American lawsuit Roe v. Wade in 1973. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned individual...
x Henry Wade Henry Wade
Henry Menasco Wade (November 11, 1914 – March 1, 2001), was a Texas lawyer who participated in two of the most notable U.S. court cases of the 20th century, the prosecution of Jack Ruby for killing Lee Harvey Oswald and the U.S. Supreme Court's...
x Privacy  
Privacy (in Latin privatus 'separated from the rest, deprived of sth, esp. office, participation in the government', from privo 'to deprive') is the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby...
x Mildred Loving Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving
Mildred Delores Jeter Loving (June 22, 1939–May 2, 2008) and her husband Richard Perry Loving (October 29, 1933–June 29, 1975) were plaintiffs in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia (1967). The Lovings were an interracial married...
x Virginia Virginia.png
The Commonwealth of Virginia ( /vərˈdʒɪnjə/ ) is a U.S. state on the Atlantic Coast of the Southern United States. Virginia is nicknamed the "Old Dominion" and sometimes the "Mother of Presidents" because it is the birthplace of eight U.S....
x Treaty of Versailles The Palace of Versailles, where the treaty was signed
The Treaty of Versailles was one of the peace treaties at the end of World War I. It ended the state of war between Germany and the Allied Powers. It was signed on 28 June 1919, exactly five years after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand....
x No Display Name    
x Germany Picture 6.png
Germany (pronounced /ˈdʒɜrməni/ ( listen)), officially the Federal Republic of Germany (German: Bundesrepublik Deutschland, pronounced [ˈbʊndəsʁepuˌbliːk ˈdɔʏtʃlant]  ( listen)), is a country in Central Europe. It is bordered to the north by the...
x Loizidou vs Turkey European Court of Human Rights building in Strasbourg
Loizidou v. Turkey is a landmark legal case regarding the rights of refugees wishing to return to their former homes and properties. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that she, and consequently all other refugees, have the right to return to...
x L'Estrange v Graucob Cigarette Vending Machine
L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 is a leading English contract law case on the incorporation of terms into a contract by signature. There are exceptions to the rule that a person is bound by his or her signature, including but not limited...
x Ashford v. Thornton  
Ashford v. Thornton was an 1818 English legal case deciding the principle that all law remains until it is repealed. In 1817, Abraham Thornton was charged with the murder of Mary Ashford, but the jury acquitted the defendant. Mary’s brother, William...
x American Ins. Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton Seal of the Supreme Court
American Ins. Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton, 26 U.S. 511 (1828), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case involved the validity of a local court established by Congress in the Florida Territory whose judges lacked life...
x New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann  
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (1932), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that due process prevented a state legislature from arbitrarily creating restrictions on new businesses only on the claim that their...
x State v. Kelly  
State v. Kelly, 97 N.J. 178 (1984), is a Supreme Court of New Jersey case where the defendant, Gladys Kelly, was on trial for the murder of her husband, Ernest Kelly with a pair of scissors. The Supreme Court reversed the case for further trial...
x Subic rape case Gloria Macapagal Arroyo
The Subic rape case, officially known as People of the Philippines vs. Chad Carpentier, Dominic Duplantis, Keith Silkwood, and Daniel Smith, was a legal case in the Philippines involving a Filipina and four US Marines. It caught wide media coverage...
x Scopes Trial Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan chat in court during the Scopes trial.
The Scopes Trial (State v. Scopes, Scopes v. State, 152 Tenn. 424, 278 S.W. 57 (Tenn. 1926), often called the "Scopes Monkey Trial") was an American legal case that tested the Butler Act, which made it unlawful, in any state-funded educational...
x Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko  
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S....
x Auer v. Robbins  
Auer v. Robbins is a United States Supreme Court case that deals with overtime pay. The question before the court was “Must sergeants and lieutenants in the St. Louis Police Department be paid for working overtime to the Fair Labor Standards Act of...
x Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner  
Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. Abbott Laboratories held that drug companies were not prohibited by ripeness doctrine from challenging a U.S. Food and Drug Administration ...
x McLean v. Arkansas  
McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255, 1258-1264 (ED Ark. 1982), was a 1981 legal case in Arkansas which ruled that the Arkansas "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act" (Act 590) was unconstitutional...
x Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court  
Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102 (1987) was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court considered whether a foreign corporation, by merely being aware that its products could end up in the forum...
x California v. Greenwood Seal of the Supreme Court
California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside the curtilage of a...
x Search and seizure Vehicle drug search australia
Search and seizure is a legal procedure used in many civil law and common law legal systems whereby police or other authorities and their agents, who suspect that a crime has been committed, do a search of a person's property and confiscate any...
x Waste Waste bags in Amsterdam
Waste (also referred to as rubbish, trash, garbage, or junk) is unwanted or unusable material. In living organisms, waste is the unwanted substances or toxins that are expelled from them. More commonly, waste refers to the materials that are...
x Commonwealth v Tasmania /guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000004a75e0b
Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1, (popularly known as the Tasmanian Dam Case) was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on July 1, 1983. The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law,...
x High Court of Australia High Court entrance
The High Court of Australia is the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy and the final court of appeal in Australia. It has both original and appellate jurisdiction, has the power of judicial review over laws passed by the Parliament of...
x Natural environment Devils Punchbowl Waterfall, New Zealand
The natural environment, commonly referred to simply as the environment, is a term that encompasses all living and non-living things occurring naturally on Earth or some region thereof. The concept of the natural environment can be distinguished by...
x Franklin Dam NoDamsTriangle
The Franklin Dam or Gordon-below-Franklin Dam project was a proposed dam on the Gordon River in Tasmania, Australia, that was never constructed. The movement that eventually led to the project's cancellation became one of most significant...
x Microsoft vs. Lindows  
Microsoft v. Lindows.com, Inc. was a court case brought by Microsoft against Lindows, Inc in December 2001, claiming that the name "Lindows" was a violation of its trademark "Windows." After two and a half years of court battles, Microsoft paid US...
x Trademark  
A trademark or trade mark is a distinctive sign or indicator used by an individual, business organization, or other legal entity to identify that the products or services to consumers with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source,...
x Microsoft 800px-Microsoft_sign_closeup.jpg
Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT, HKEX: 4338) is a multinational computer technology corporation that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of software products for computing devices. Headquartered in Redmond, Washington,...
x Sankey v Whitlam /guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000004a75e0b
Sankey v Whitlam was an important court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 9 November 1978. On 20 November 1975, in the middle of the election campaign which followed the dismissal of the Whitlam government, a Sydney solicitor, Danny...
x Danny Sankey    
x Gough Whitlam Gough Whitlam
Edward Gough Whitlam, AC, QC (born 11 July 1916), known as Gough Whitlam (pronounced /ˈɡɒf/ goff), is a former Australian politician, representing the New South Wales seat of Werriwa, and 21st Prime Minister of Australia. A member of the Australian...
x Mabo v Queensland /guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000004a75e0b
Mabo v Queensland (No 1) was a significant court case decided in the High Court of Australia on December 8, 1988. It found that the Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act, which attempted to retrospectively abolish native title rights, was not...
x Native title  
Native title is "the recognition by Australian law that some Indigenous people have rights and interests to their land that come from their traditional laws and customs". The concept recognises in certain cases there was and is a continued...
x Land rights  
Land rights are those property rights that pertain to real estate land. Because land is a limited resource and property rights include the right to exclude others, land rights are a form of monopoly. Those without land rights must enter into land...
x Eddie Mabo  
Eddie Koiki Mabo (c. 29 June 1936–21 January 1992) was a Torres Strait Islander who became famous in Australian history for his role in campaigning for indigenous land rights and for his role in a landmark decision of the High Court of Australia...
x Government of Queensland Australian Coat of Arms (since 1912)
The Government of Queensland is commonly known as the "Queensland Government". The form of the Government of Queensland is prescribed in its Constitution, which dates from 1859, although it has been amended many times since then. Since 1901...
x Williams v. Price  
Williams v. Price (343 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2003)) was a 2003 legal case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The appellant was Ronald A. Williams, an African-American prisoner; the suit was brought against James Price,...
x Adelaide Company of Jehovah's Witnesses v Commonwealth /guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000004a75e0b
Adelaide Company of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 116 (also known as the Jehovah's Witnesses case) was an important court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 14 June 1943. In January 1941, acting pursuant to the...
x Religion Various religious symbols
A religion is a system of human thought which usually includes a set of narratives, symbols, beliefs and practices that give meaning to the practitioner's experiences of life through reference to a higher power, deity or deities, or ultimate truth....
x Ray v. Blair Seal of the Supreme Court
Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (1952), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. It was a case on state political parties requiring of presidential electors to pledge to vote for the party's nominees before being certified as...
x Election ElezioneBrunate
An election is a formal decision-making process by which a population chooses an individual to hold public office. Elections have been the usual mechanism by which modern representative democracy since the 17th century. Elections may fill offices...
x McLibel case Mcspotlight
McDonald's Restaurants v Morris & Steel (or the McLibel case) was an English lawsuit filed by McDonald's Corporation against environmental activists Helen Steel and David Morris (often referred to as "The McLibel Two") over a pamphlet critical of...
x Slander and libel  
In law, defamation – also called calumny, libel, slander (for spoken words), and vilification (for written or otherwise published words) – is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may...
x McDonald's Logo.
McDonald's Corporation (NYSE: MCD) is the world's largest chain of hamburger fast food restaurants, serving nearly 47 million customers daily. At one time it was the largest global restaurant chain, but it has since been surpassed by multi-brand...
x Helen Steel    
x David Morris    
x Kohl v United States  
Kohl v. United States, 91 U.S. 367 (1875), was a court case that took place in the Supreme Court of the United States. It invoked the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and is related to the issue of Eminent Domain. Eminent domain was...
x Eminent domain The famous nail house in Chongqing
Eminent domain (United States), compulsory purchase (United Kingdom, New Zealand, Ireland), resumption/compulsory acquisition (Australia) or expropriation (South Africa and Canada's common law systems) is the inherent power of the state to seize a...
Edit Collection Schema
All topics in this collection are typed as Topic
Use Data from this Collection
Choose a format:

Images and articles are not included in export files, which are limited to 1000 items. Complete data dumps are also available here.

Flag this Collection
Why do you want to flag this collection?